Story via AFP, news.com.au
UN slams N Korea, Iran on human rights
A KEY UN committee passed resolutions condemning human rights abuses by North Korea and Iran amid growing Western pressure for action.
An annual vote on North Korea was passed by consensus for the first time, with not even close ally China voting against.
But a reduced majority passed a similar condemnation of Iran’s human rights record at the UN General Assembly committee, which was also to vote on Syria’s case.
The resolution on North Korea, prepared by European nations, slammed the “systematic, widespread and grave violations of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights,” in the tightly controlled Stalinist nation.
It highlighted the use of torture and prison camps and draconian restrictions on freedom of movement.
North Koreans can be executed for trying to flee the country, according to activists. And a UN special rapporteur on North Korea, former Indonesian foreign minister Marzuki Darusman, has estimated there are 150,000-200,000 people in North Korean prison camps.
A North Korean diplomat at the meeting, Kim Song, called the resolution “state political terrorism.” He rejected all the allegations against his country.
China did not vote against but along with other allies such as Iran made it known that it opposed any resolution that concentrates on one country.
A similar condemnation of Iran was passed with 83 votes in favor, 31 against and 68 abstaining. Last year, 86 countries backed the resolution and 32 opposed it.
The resolution, again prepared by Western nations, hit out at torture and executions in Iran, “widespread” restrictions of freedom and “pervasive” violence against women.
Iran’s UN ambassador Mohammad Khazaee said the resolution was unbalanced and contained 150 “unsubstantiated” allegations. China, Russia and Syria were among those who voted against.
All the resolutions passed by the General Assembly’s Third Committee, which concentrates on human rights, are non-binding, but they are also the subject of fierce diplomatic lobbying.
The resolutions will go to a formal vote in the General Assembly in December where they should be easily passed.
During UN Chief Ban Ki-Moon’s recent visit to Tehran calls were made to let him meet Iranian opposition leaders, in order to give a more complete picture of the political landscape in the country and mostly of the true state of human rights in Iran – Expected to be drastically less bright than the image presented by the authorities.
These requests were declined, right about when Khamenei made strategic remarks denouncing the UN and some of it’s bodies “undemocratic”. On August 30 during the NAM Summit, Khamenei slammed the “overt dictatorship” of the U.N. Security Council in a speech opening the NAM summit that included U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon in the audience.
“The U.N. Security Council has an irrational, unjust and utterly undemocratic structure, and this is an overt dictatorship,” Khamenei told the 120-member Non-Aligned Movement summit.”*
In the meanwhile, Iranian opposition leaders are trapped in their own homes, subjects of a house arrest, for over 18 months now. How could this situation be contained by a regime in a country that declares itself democratic and calls for revisions of structure and participation in the UN based on grounds of inherent “dictatorship”?